Appendicitis Research Today is a free monthly online journal that collates and summarizes the latest research about Appendicitis, including details on symptoms, surgery, causes, treatment. | ||||||||
|
Clinical prediction rule to distinguish pelvic inflammatory disease from acute appendicitis in women of childbearing age.Morishita K, Gushimiyagi M, Hashiguchi M, Stein GH, Tokuda Y Department of Surgery, Okinawa Hokubu Hospital, Okinawa, Japan. morishita_koji@hosp.pref.okinawa.jp OBJECTIVE: We aimed to develop a clinical prediction rule to distinguish pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) from acute appendicitis in women of childbearing age. METHODS: We reviewed medical records over a 4-year period of female patients of childbearing age who had presented with abdominal pain at an urban emergency department and had either appendicitis (n = 109) or PID (n = 72). A prediction rule was developed by use of recursive partitioning based on significant factors for the discrimination. RESULTS: The significant factors to favor PID over appendicitis were (1) no migration of pain (odds ratio [OR], 4.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.5-11.5), (2) bilateral abdominal tenderness (OR, 16.7; 95% CI, 5.3-50.0), and (3) absence of nausea and vomiting (OR, 8.4; 95% CI, 2.8-24.8). The prediction rule could rule out appendicitis from PID with sensitivity of 99% (95% CI, 94-100%) when classified as a low-risk group by the following factors: (1) no migration of pain, (2) bilateral abdominal tenderness, and (3) no nausea and vomiting. CONCLUSION: We developed a prediction rule for childbearing-aged women presenting with acute abdominal pain to distinguish acute appendicitis from PID based on 3 simple, clinical features: migration of pain, bilateral abdominal tenderness, and nausea and vomiting. Prospective validation is needed in other settings. Published 5 February 2007 in Am J Emerg Med, 25(2): 152-7.
© 2004-2008 Appendicitis Research Today. All Rights Reserved. |
| ||||||